48 / 100
Median score
Below 60 for 76% of sites. Only one scored 80 or higher.
Free tool · no signup wall
Your AI-search readiness, scored 0 to 100.
Submit a URL and we check whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI can read your site, parse the page and recognise the brand. A 0–100 score across eight categories, quick fixes and a PDF report reach your inbox in 2–5 minutes. The median across 345 sites audited so far is 48 out of 100.
Open-source engine (GEO Optimizer, MIT) · the same page always gets the same score · report in 2–5 minutes.
Real cases
What GEO work changes: before → after.
Crypto licensing · Gofaizen & Sherle
Before
Top-10 rankings were there, but the click was gone — Google started answering itself.
We did
An entity layer in place of a two-node schema: Article, Person, Service — plus a structural fix on the language version.
After
Read the case → Cited in the Google AI Overview body; source #1 on the El Salvador query. First firm listed in ChatGPT.
Education · AP University
Before
A young brand in a crowded niche — no rankings, no mentions in AI answers.
We did
GEO and classic SEO as one loop: entity content, structured data, work aimed at being quotable.
After
Read the case → Cited in the body of Google AI Overviews. Over 16 months: 242K impressions, 3.65K clicks, average position 12.1.
Compliance · AML certification
Before
The site was never cited in AI answers on its own industry queries.
We did
GEO plus structured data plus entity content built for LLM citability.
After
Read the case → In the AI Overview body and among Perplexity sources. Over 16 months: 8.53K clicks, 1.6M impressions.
Landscaping · GardenPark
Before
A GEO audit scored 39/100 — the brand never showed up in AI answers.
We did
Audit → prioritised fixes → implementation: schema, answer-first structure, AI bot access, entity content.
After
Read the case → The brand sits in the body of Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT answers for its main commercial query.
Want the same? The free score is a starting point. From there our GEO team works the brand into AI answers on your commercial queries. We work in hard, regulated niches: legal services, iGaming, crypto, finance.
All cases GEO promotion by Chyzh →Data from our audits
345 sites have been through the audit. Here's what breaks most often.
72%
No llms.txt
That's up to 18 points lost: llms.txt weighs as much as AI crawler access.
92%
No FAQ markup
The audited page has no FAQPage markup, which is worth up to 3 points in schema.
2%
Block a citation bot
Access is rarely the problem. More often the bots get in and find neither llms.txt nor markup.
Data as of 28 Sep 2026: 345 unique sites audited since May 2026, excluding our own and test sites. These are people who ran the check themselves, not a random sample of the web.
What's in the report
Eight categories, published weights, adding up to 100.
Each category shows its maximum. In the PDF, findings are split across three horizons: quick fixes for week one, medium ones for weeks two and three, strategic ones for the quarter.
AI crawler access 18
Whether robots.txt names the bots that decide citations: OAI-SearchBot, Claude-SearchBot, PerplexityBot, Googlebot and Applebot. Full points only when all five are named.
llms.txt 18
Whether the file exists and how complete it is: title, summary, sections, links, enough depth, llms-full.txt.
Schema markup 16
JSON-LD on the page: Organization, WebSite, FAQ, Article — and how fully the attributes are filled in.
Metadata 14
Title, description, canonical and Open Graph.
On-page content 12
H1 and heading hierarchy, lists and tables, concrete numbers, the answer near the top.
Brand as an entity 10
A consistent brand name, sameAs to Wikidata, LinkedIn or Crunchbase, About and contact pages.
Technical signals 6
The page language in the lang attribute, an RSS feed, an update date.
Files for AI agents 6
/.well-known/ai.txt, /ai/summary.json, faq.json and service.json.
How it works
How the scan works.
- 1
You submit a URL
Your site, a competitor's, or both. We don't ask for a budget or team size; the phone field is optional.
- 2
We run 47 checks
robots.txt and AI crawler access, llms.txt, schema, metadata, on-page content, brand entity, files for AI agents. Server-side, in 60–90 seconds.
- 3
You get the report
An email with a score for each category, up to four quick fixes for this sprint and up to two strategic tasks, plus a PDF report. Reply if you want a human to walk you through it.
Limits of the tool
What this audit doesn't do.
It doesn't count whether you're already cited.
The score measures how ready the site is for AI search. To see who already cites your domain in ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews and Gemini, use a separate tool — AI Citation Checker.
It checks one page.
The one you submit, plus robots.txt and llms.txt at the domain root. Your homepage and a service page can score differently, so check the page that's meant to bring in clients.
A rerun within an hour returns the same number.
The engine caches each URL's result for an hour. After you ship fixes, wait at least an hour before running it again.
The free audit and the paid one run the same checks. The paid one adds a human reading the report, research into your niche's queries, and an engineer who ships the fixes.
FAQ
Honest answers about a free tool.
Is it actually free? What's the catch?
Yes, fully — no credit card, no scheduled call. The catch is honest: if your score is under 60 and you want help fixing it, we'll offer ongoing support. If it's above 80, we'll say so and pitch nothing.
How long does it take?
The scan runs in 60–90 seconds and the report email lands in 2–5 minutes. If it hasn't arrived within 10, check spam, then write to info@chyzh.agency.
What do you do with my URL and email?
The URL goes into the audit queue and stays in our database for comparisons — anonymous and aggregated only, like the figures on this page. Your email gets the report and a short follow-up series you can leave in one click. We never sell or share contact data.
Can I audit a competitor site?
You can: public URL, public score, nothing private. Scoring two or three competitors helps, because then your own score reads in the context of your niche.
My site ranks well on Google, but the score is low. Is that normal?
It happens. The score looks at things classic SEO usually ignores: llms.txt, files for AI agents, bots named explicitly in robots.txt. Of the 345 sites audited so far, 72% have no llms.txt.
How is this different from a regular SEO audit?
A regular SEO audit grades you for Google's blue links. This one checks whether AI systems can read and quote your site — what people now call GEO or AEO. Different signals, different fixes: which bots robots.txt names, whether llms.txt exists, whether the markup works for extracting facts, whether the brand resolves as an entity. We've run SEO since 2011; this tool covers only the AI side.
Why should I trust the score?
The 47 checks come from the open-source GEO Optimizer engine (MIT license, Auriti Labs); the report rules are ours. The score is deterministic: the same page with the same files gives the same number. For comparison there are 345 sites audited since May 2026, with a median of 48.
Do you take hard niches: legal, iGaming, crypto?
Yes, that is our core profile: legal services and licensing, iGaming, crypto and finance, and other regulated markets where ads are restricted and only strong sources make it into AI answers. The free score is the same for every niche. The paid work is where the industry matters: which queries your clients ask and which sources AI systems cite in your field.
Ready for your score?
Same form, same report — in your inbox within 2–5 minutes.
Run my free AI auditAlready have your report and want a human to read it with you? Book a free 30-minute review — no obligation.