Robots & crawlers
Whether GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot and Google-Extended can read your content.
Free tool · no signup wall
Your AI-search visibility, scored 0 to 100.
Submit a URL and we run 47 checks — robots.txt, llms.txt, schema, entity signals, AI discoverability — then email you a 0–100 score and the three fixes that'll move it most. It grades whether ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Google AI Overviews can find and quote you, not just whether Google ranks you.
The 47 checks come from the open-source GEO Optimizer toolkit (Auriti Labs, MIT) plus our own playbook, benchmarked against 500+ sites we've audited since 2023. Run it twice and the score barely moves.
Real cases
What GEO work changes: before → after.
Crypto licensing · Gofaizen & Sherle
Before
Top-10 rankings were there, but the click was gone — Google started answering itself.
We did
An entity layer in place of a two-node schema: Article, Person, Service — plus a structural fix on the language version.
After
Read the case → Cited in the Google AI Overview body; source #1 on the El Salvador query. First firm listed in ChatGPT.
Education · AP University
Before
A young brand in a crowded niche — no rankings, no mentions in AI answers.
We did
GEO and classic SEO as one loop: entity content, structured data, work aimed at being quotable.
After
Read the case → Cited in the body of Google AI Overviews. Over 16 months: 242K impressions, 3.65K clicks, average position 12.1.
Compliance · AML certification
Before
The site was never cited in AI answers on its own industry queries.
We did
GEO plus structured data plus entity content built for LLM citability.
After
Read the case → In the AI Overview body and among Perplexity sources. Over 16 months: 8.53K clicks, 1.6M impressions.
Landscaping · GardenPark
Before
A GEO audit scored 39/100 — the brand never showed up in AI answers.
We did
Audit → prioritised fixes → implementation: schema, answer-first structure, AI bot access, entity content.
After
Read the case → The brand sits in the body of Google AI Overviews and ChatGPT answers for its main commercial query.
Want the same? The free score is a starting point. From there our GEO team works the brand into AI answers on your commercial queries.
All cases GEO promotion by Chyzh →What's in the report
What the score actually measures.
The report grades 47 signals across the eight buckets below, then ranks each issue by impact vs effort. You get the full breakdown, but the summary flags only three fixes — the ones most teams can realistically ship in a sprint.
llms.txt
Presence and quality of the AI-readable site map AI engines now look for.
Schema markup
JSON-LD coverage across Organization, Article, Product, FAQ, sameAs and speakable.
Metadata
Titles, descriptions, canonicals, OG tags — the basics that still fail on roughly half of the 500+ sites we've scanned.
Content depth
Whether passages are extractable, answers come first, and Quick Facts blocks exist.
Brand & entity
Whether AI engines can connect your brand to a real entity — Wikidata, sameAs, named experts.
Authority signals
External citations, HARO mentions, structured author bios, E-E-A-T markers.
AI discoverability
Snapshot of how often you already appear in ChatGPT, Perplexity and AI Overviews.
How it works
How the scan works.
- 1
You submit a URL
Your site, a competitor, or both — the form takes about 20 seconds. We don't require a phone number, a budget range, or a team-size dropdown.
- 2
We run 47 checks
We run 47 GEO/AEO checks server-side in 60–90 seconds: robots.txt and AI-bot access, llms.txt validation, schema coverage, entity signals, content extractability, and live AI-engine sampling.
- 3
You get the report
You get an HTML report by email — the score, eight category bars, and three priority fixes. No call needed to read it, and you can reply if you want a human to walk through it.
What teams do with the score
What teams change after the score.
62 → 88
Crypto-licensing site, 8 weeks
This crypto-licensing site's AI-search score climbed from 62 to 88 in eight weeks, after four fixes the audit flagged: GPTBot allowed, llms.txt published, FAQ schema across 40 pages, and a named regulatory expert with sameAs. Its first Perplexity citation landed in week three.
47 → 74
B2B SaaS, 12 weeks
This B2B SaaS went from 47 to 74 in twelve weeks. The audit named one structural fix — moving the answer above the fold on every product page — and one content fix: turning FAQs into Quick Facts blocks. ChatGPT started quoting them by month two.
71 → 71
Local services, no change
This local-services site stayed at 71 — no change. The bottleneck was off-site: the brand had almost no entity footprint, nothing in Wikidata, barely a third-party citation. The fix there was HARO and trade press, not code, and that takes longer than twelve weeks to show.
We've run digital marketing since 2011 and the AI-audit playbook since 2023. The free audit and the paid one run the same 47 checks — what you pay for is the human reading them, the query-universe research, and the engineer who ships the fixes.
FAQ
Honest answers about a free tool.
Is it actually free? What's the catch?
Yes, fully free — no credit card, no scheduled call. The catch is honest: if your score is under 60 and you want help fixing it, we'll pitch one of our retainers. If it's above 80, we'll tell you that too and probably pitch nothing.
How long does it take?
The scan runs in 60–90 seconds, then the email with your full report lands in 2–5 minutes. If it hasn't shown up within 10, check spam and ping info@chyzh.agency.
What do you do with my URL and email?
The URL goes into the audit queue and stays in our database for anonymous, aggregated benchmarking. Your email gets the report and a short follow-up you can leave in one click. We never sell or share contact data.
Can I audit a competitor site?
You can. Public URL, public score, nothing private or authenticated. A lot of teams score their top three competitors first to set a benchmark before scoring themselves.
How is this different from a regular SEO audit?
A regular SEO audit grades you for Google's blue links. This one grades you for being the source AI engines quote when they answer a question — what people now call GEO (generative engine optimization) or AEO (answer engine optimization). Different signals, different fixes: robots.txt rules for GPTBot, llms.txt, schema built for extraction, entity authority. We've run SEO audits since 2011 and AI-search audits since 2023; this tool only does the AI side.
Why should I trust the score?
The 47 checks come from the open-source GEO Optimizer toolkit (MIT license, Auriti Labs) plus our own playbook on top. We benchmark against 500+ sites we've audited since 2023, and the score is stable run-to-run — you'll get essentially the same number twice.
Ready for your score?
Same form, still free — seconds to fill, a couple of minutes to your inbox.
Run my free AI auditAlready audited and want a human to read it with you? Book a free 30-minute review — no SDR layer, no obligation.